Derek Chauvin ‘betrayed his badge’ when he used ‘lethal force’ on George Floyd, prosecutor says

1.5k

View
comments

A mixed martial arts fighter who was called to testify in the Derek Chauvin trial said that the former Minneapolis police officer was using a technique designed to cut off George Floyd’s air circulation while he was kneeling on his neck for more than nine minutes last May. 

Donald Winn Williams II, the third and final prosecution witness of the day, described himself as a father, fighter and entrepreneur who had yelled at Chauvin to check for a pulse and called out the officer for placing Floyd in what he called a ‘kill choke’ – known to him because of his own jiu jitsu training.

‘The officer on top was shimmying to actually get the final choke in while he was on top, the kill choke,’ Williams told Minnesota Assistant Attorney General Matthew Frank during direct examination. 

Williams said that he had watched Floyd ‘fade away like a fish in a bag.’

He said, ‘You see his eyes slowly pale out and he knew…he vocalized it, his eyes rolled to the back of his head, you saw the blood coming out of his nose, he said his stomach hurt and from then on he was lifeless. He didn’t speak.’

Based on his experience Williams said that what he witnessed was a ‘kill choke’, cutting off Floyd’s circulation at his neck.

He said that when he had called Chauvin out for using the technique the former officer and he, ‘looked at each other right in the eyes and he acknowledged it.’

Williams strayed into contentious territory when he gave the opinion that Chauvin was killing Floyd by ‘shimmying’ or adjusting his position on the dying man’s neck.

Judge Cahill checked Williams for coming to a conclusion by saying that he was ‘killing’ Floyd by employing the well-known technique that saw him double down and tighten his choke hold.

Frank played portions of the video of Chauvin as he pressed his knee into Floyd’s neck and Williams pointed out each time he saw the former officer’s foot move and, he said, the pressure on Floyd increased.

Recalling the scene, Williams had harsh words for officer Tou Thao who he described as ‘the dictator’ on the scene.

He said ‘He dictated what went on on the curb, he controlled the crowd, he controlled me. He was the guy who let it go on while it went on.’

William’s testimony will continue tomorrow after a technical glitch saw the feed being viewed by Floyd’s family go down causing Judge Cahill to call proceedings to an end.  

Earlier on Monday, a 911 dispatcher who watched live video of police kneeling on Floyd testified that she called the officers’ supervisor because she felt ‘something wasn’t right’. 

The dispatcher, Jena Scurry, was the first witness called by the prosecution after opening statements on Monday morning. 

It was Scurry who sent officers to the Cup Foods at 38th and Chicago Avenue on May 25, 2020, after receiving a call about a man using a counterfeit bill.

Questioned by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Frank, Scurry told how she had seen surveillance footage of the incident from one of the city’s pole mounted cameras and been struck by a ‘gut instinct’ that ‘something wasn’t right’.

She explained how what had seemed a routine call escalated into something that caused her concern as the jurors were shown the footage that she herself had caught by chance on the screen in her dispatch unit that day.

The video, which had not previously been released publicly, showed Chauvin and fellow officers Thomas Lane and J Alexander Keung perched atop Floyd next to a squad car while officer Tou Thao looked on. 

Scurry noted that she wasn’t watching the stream the entire time because she was fielding other calls. But she said that as she glanced away and back again, she was struck that the officers hadn’t moved and asked a colleague if the screen had frozen. 

‘I first asked if the screens had frozen because it hadn’t changed. I thought something might be wrong,’ she said.

‘They had come from the back of the squad to the ground and my instincts were telling me that something was not right.

‘It was an extended period of time. I can’t tell you the exact period and they hadn’t told me if they needed any more resources but I became concerned that something might be wrong.’ 

She said that she hadn’t wanted to be a ‘snitch’ but she recognized what appeared to be use of force and stated: ‘I took that instinct and I called the sergeant.’

Scurry’s testimony came after the prosecution played another bystander video showing Chauvin kneeling on Floyd as the handcuffed black man cried out: ‘I can’t breathe.’  

‘You can believe your eyes. That it’s homicide, it’s murder,’ trial attorney Jerry Blackwell told the jury in his opening statement, where he argued that Chauvin ‘betrayed the badge’. 

Blackwell emphasized that Chauvin ‘did not get up, did not let up’ for nine minutes and 29 seconds, even after Floyd stopped breathing and despite the fevered pleas from bystanders for him to release Floyd.  

In the opening for the defense, Chauvin’s lawyer Eric Nelson noted the mountain of evidence in the case – totaling more than 50,000 items – and said: ‘This case is clearly about more than 9 minutes and 29 seconds.’ 

Nelson urged the jury to consider the mindset of Chauvin and his fellow officers, asserting that they felt threatened both by Floyd and by the growing crowd. He also argued that Floyd’s death was caused by his underlying heart disease, drug use and ‘adrenaline’.

Chauvin looked on, smartly dressed in grey suit, blue shirt and tie. 

Taking copious notes on a yellow legal pad, as he did throughout the jury selection process, he looked for all the world like co-counsel rather than the accused. 

The 45-year-old is charged on three counts in connection with Floyd’s death: second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.

If convicted on the most serious count, Chauvin faces a possible 40 years in prison. If found guilty of manslaughter he faces a maximum penalty of ten years though he could be free within five.

Much hangs on the outcome of this trial – not least the likely fates of Lane, 38; Keung, 27; and Thao, 35; the three officers currently awaiting trial for aiding and abetting in Floyd’s death. 

Just before the trial opened on Monday, Floyd’s brothers Philonise and Terrence took a knee in front of Hennepin County Courthouse for 8 minutes and 46 seconds – the length of time Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck last spring. 

Reverend Al Sharpton, Floyd family attorney Benjamin Crump, Floyd’s nephew Brandon Williams and other supporters joined the brothers in the silent act of protest.  

Inside the court and speaking behind plexiglass, Blackwell told the jurors that the badge that Chauvin had worn as a Minneapolis Police Officer was a small badge that brings with it, ‘a large responsibility and accountability’.

It symbolizes, the attorney said, ‘the very motto of the Minneapolis Police Department: “To protect with courage and to serve with compassion.”‘

Blackwell told jurors that ‘sanctity of life and protection of the public’ – the very essence of policing – were at the heart of the case.

These, he said, were the noble ideals that Chauvin disregarded as he squeezed the life out of Floyd for a total of 9 mins and 29 seconds: the most important numbers, he said, that they will hear in this case.

‘What you will learn is that the use of force has to be evaluated minute by minute. What may be reasonable in the first minute may not be reasonable in the fourth or in the ninth minute 29 seconds,’ Blackwell said.

‘What Mr Chauvin used was lethal force. The evidence is going to show you there was no cause in the first place to use that against a man who was defenseless, who was handcuffed, who was not resisting.’

Chauvin listened as Blackwell calmly told the jury that the prosecution would prove beyond a reasonable doubt that, though he sat there today with the presumption of innocence, ‘Mr Chauvin was anything other than innocent.’

Blackwell explained that the state will bring their case through a series of civilian and expert witnesses including, he said, Minneapolis Chief of Police Medario Arradondo, who, he promised them, ‘will not mince his words. He will be very clear, very decisive that his was excessive force’.

They will hear from medical experts, experts in use of force and many bystanders including a trained first responder who tried to intervene only for Chauvin to pull his mace from his belt and threaten her until she stepped back. 

And they will hear from a little girl – a minor seen wearing a green shirt bearing the word ‘Love’ in video shown to the court this morning – who had simply gone to Cup Foods with her cousin to get snacks and candy.

The court sat in silence as Blackwell played the bystander video. The distressing footage so inextricably bound to this case was being seen for the first time by at least one of the jurors.  

As the trial progresses, through the gut-wrenching videos that the jury will watch and re-watch, Blackwell said: ‘You’ll be able to see every part of what Mr Floyd went through; from crying out, to his efforts to move his shoulder to try to breathe, you will hear his voice getting heavier, his respiration more shallow. 

‘When he’s unconscious [you will see] the uncontrollable shaking – the anoxic seizures from oxygen deficiency, the agonal breathing, the gasps, and you will hear when there’s a lack of a pulse.’

There was no doubt, Blackwell told the jury, ‘Someone pressing down on him for 9 minutes and 29 seconds is enough to take a life.’

As he told the jury all of the things that this death was not about – a heart attack, overdose or high blood pressure – Blackwell sought to tighten the jurors’ focus on those 9mins and 29 seconds. 

He said: ‘Mr Floyd lived with those conditions day in, day out for years until the day he went into the circle of the 9 minutes and 29 seconds and didn’t come out again.’

When it was the defense attorney Nelson’s turn to deliver his opening statements he sought to do the exact opposite.

To Nelson this was about reason, doubt and common sense. This was about the ‘totality’ of everything that went before and all that came after those minutes and those seconds.

He stretched out the scope of the investigation by telling the jury that over 50 law enforcement agents had investigated a case, interviewing more than 50 members of the Minneapolis Police Department and nearly 200 civilian witnesses. There are, he told them, more than 50,000 stamped pieces of evidence and documentation.

‘Reason’ he told them, ‘dictates how the evidence must be looked at. Common sense is exactly that – common sense tells us that there are always two sides to a story, common sense tell us we have to examine the totality of the evidence.

‘That’s what this case is ultimately about, the evidence. It is nothing more than that. There is no political or social cause in this court room. But the evidence is far greater than 9 minutes and 29 seconds.’

Nelson talked the jury through the events of May 25, 2020 minute by minute breaking it down into four key locations: the Mercedes Benz in which Floyd and his companions that day traveled, the Cup Foods store, the squad car into which officers tried to wrangle Floyd and Hennepin County Medical Center where attempts to revive Floyd ultimately failed.

He breadcrumbed a path that, he said, could only lead to once conclusion – that Floyd died, not because of Chauvin’s actions but due to a perfect storm partially of his own making: his pre-existing heart condition and hypertension, ingestion of opioids and the adrenaline that flooded his system as he struggled with the officers that day.

‘You will learn that Derek Chauvin did exactly what he had been trained to do over the course of his 19-year career. The use of force is not attractive, but it is a necessary component of policing,’ Nelson said.

He concluded: ‘When you hear the law and apply reason there will only be one just result. That will be to find Mr Chauvin not guilty.’ 

After a quick recess the prosecution called its first witness, Jena Scurry, who had received calls from bystanders when police were struggling with Floyd and watched video of the incident via a remote camera.  

Blackwell mentioned Scurry in his opening statement and said that upon seeing live video of Floyd’s arrest: ‘She did something that she had never done in her career. She called the police on the police.’  

Frank, the prosecutor questioning Scurry, played video from the same camera she was watching as the incident unfolded and asked her to identify which parts she had watched live. She said she missed some portions because she was busy handling other calls. 

The video clearly showed officers Lane and Keung attempting to get Floyd into their squad car before being joined by Chauvin and Thao. 

Glancing at the screen as she worked her shift Scurry told how she noticed the squad car rocking and was struck by the length of time that it seemed to be taking for the officers to get Floyd into the vehicle.

At one point she looked away and when she looked back Floyd was on the ground with Chauvin, Lane and Keung restraining him while Thou looked on.

Glancing away and back again she asked a colleague if the screen had frozen as she registered that the scene remained apparently unchanged for what seemed to her to be an unusual length of time. 

She said she then called the officers’ supervising sergeant to report the apparent use of force. 

Frank played audio from the call, in which Scurry said: ‘I don’t know if they had to use force or not. They got something out of the back of the squad and all of them sat on this man. So I don’t know if they needed to or not but they haven’t said anything to me yet.’ 

‘You can call me a snitch if you want to,’ she added.

She said she made the call to ‘voice my concerns’ and noted that she had never made one like it to a police sergeant before.    

Cross examining Scurry, Nelson was at pains to underscore gaps in what she saw and the facts that she had no police training, little knowledge of what the calls to which she sent officers actually looked like and pointed out that her attention was not trained on the screen at all times.

He said: ‘You testified that it’s very rare that you actually see an incident that you dispatch on these city cameras.’

Scurry agreed and admitted that in the seven years that she had been a dispatcher she had seen ‘three maybe four calls’ on the television screens in her unit.

He reminded the dispatcher that when she had been questioned by a BCA agent in June 2020 she had told him that she had heard ‘yelling and shouting’ that had prompted her to call for back up though the officers on the scene had not requested any.

But he observed that, for the most part, she could not hear what was being said by or to any of the officers and he suggested that her sense of the duration of the incident may have been affected by the real-time buffering of the milestone camera on which the events unfolded.

Attempting to cast further doubt on Scurry’s true understanding and perception of what she had seen, Nelson explained, ‘You watched it in real time subject to a few seconds of delay for the time it took the signal to get through.’

Shown the same footage played through Nelson’s computer Scurry agreed that the pace of the incident was different. She also acknowledged the extent to which the squad car rocked back and forth while the officers and Floyd struggled and she had not been fully privy nor paying full attention to what was going on. 

Jurors were shown yet more previously unseen video footage as the afternoon progressed this time in the form of a series of cell phone recordings made by Alisha Oyler, a cashier at the Speedway gas station opposite Cup Foods who was the state’s second witness.

In faltering testimony Oyler told prosecutor Steven Schleicher that she had been working the register at the front of the store May 25, 2020.

‘Trying not to cuss’ and frequently failing to recall events she explained that she had first noticed police ‘messing with someone’ outside the Dragon Wok restaurant opposite Cup Foods. 

She said she had watched officers handcuff Floyd and take him across to the now infamous site of squad car 320 in front of the store’s entrance and continued to record events on her cell phone as she stepped out to have a cigarette.

She said she had done so because the police were ‘always messing with people and it’s not right’.

As Oyler’s testimony continued jurors were shown extended footage from both the city’s milestone camera that overlooked Cup Foods and Oyler’s cell phone. The images were spliced together, side by side.

In them Chauvin’s back is clearly visible showing that he did not move from where he knelt on Floyd’s neck even as first responders prepared the stretcher onto which they ultimately loaded the dead man’s limp body.

Floyd’s brother, Philonise, spoke to Today on Monday morning and called his brother’s death a ‘modern day lynching’ and said the family is ‘feeling good’ about what’s to come in the trial.

‘We know that this case, to us, is a slam dunk because we know the video is the proof, that’s all you need,’ he said.

‘The guy was kneeling on my brother’s neck for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, a guy who was sworn in to protect. He killed my brother in broad daylight.’ 

At a press conference before supporters took a knee outside the courthouse, family attorney Crump said: ‘Today starts a landmark trial that will be a referendum on how far America has come in its quest for equality and justice for all.’

Rev Sharpton added: ‘Chauvin is in the courtroom, but America’s on trial. 

‘What kind of venom, what kind of hatred do you have that would make you press down that long while a man is begging for his life, begging for his mother? At what point does your humanity kick in?’

Floyd’s nephew, Williams, told the crowd: ‘If this trial is hard, we got two justice systems in America — one for white America and one for Black America.’

In the courtroom on the 18th Floor of Hennepin County District Court proceedings are being livestreamed and viewed across the world, as Judge Peter Cahill has permitted cameras into his court for the first time in Minnesota’s history.

Ahead of the opening statements and before the jury were brought in, Judge Cahill reminded both prosecution and defense that he was ‘very strict’ about not permitting any argument in opening statements.

To that end he made it clear that neither side could try to crawl into the mind of Floyd or Chauvin.

He said as far as Floyd was concerned the defense were permitted to use, ‘Description of appearances even to the point of saying he appeared to be not complying because someone to testify to that. But they cannot say he was resisting especially in opening.

‘Those are conclusions and inferences drawn from his behavior.’

As far as the prosecution’s presentation of Chauvin, Judge Cahill said, ‘It’s permissible to talk about the policy and how an officer has to follow this policy.’

But it is not permissible, he said, to stray into the use of the word ‘should’.

He explained: ‘For example: “Mr Chauvin should have made this evaluation”. That’s arguing. But to say: “This is the policy, this is what every officer on the scene should do.” That’s objective.’

Judge Cahill made his comments in response to the Assistant Attorney General’s request that he clarify an earlier ruling and not permit the defense to tell the jury that Floyd was, ‘trying to fight with the officers intentionally or that he was faking or malingering his medical distress’.

He asked that,’the statements about Mr Floyd have to be based on the objective reasonableness standard.’

It was a request to which Chauvin’s attorney Eric J Nelson willingly agreed.

Outside, the court and government buildings that flank it have been turned into a fortress. 

Approach roads have been blocked off and the buildings buttressed with a double layer of concrete barricades. Bails of barbed wire spiral between the blocks and steel fences loom above.

Windows are boarded up sealing the court off from public view and green tarpaulin covers the fencing by the parking lot and entrance believed to be reserved for jurors whose anonymity will be strictly guarded.

Armored vehicles and members of the National Guard stand ready, in a security effort estimated to have already cost more than $1million.

It is ten months since Floyd, a black man, died beneath the knee of white police officer Chauvin.

Recorded by a bystander, video of Floyd, his face pressed into the asphalt outside Cup Foods on 38th Street and Chicago Avenue, quickly went viral. For nearly nine agonizing minutes Floyd begged: ‘I can’t breathe,’ and called for his mother before falling silent and still. And all the while Chauvin, blank-faced and unmoved, appeared oblivious to the man dying beneath him and the bystanders who yelled at him to check for a pulse.

The protests and sporadic violence that followed Floyd’s death on May 25 defined the summer. Some marched under the banner of Black Lives Matter. Some called for the police to be defunded and disbanded. Others vowed No Justice No Peace. The actions of all were felt across the globe.

In Minneapolis the city burned. On the night of May 28, three days after Floyd’s death, the police department’s Third Precinct out of which Chauvin worked was abandoned by officers as it was overwhelmed, first by the mob and then by fire.

Stores were looted and torn apart as a tidal wave of violence swelled with each night’s curfew and crashed over the days’ righteous rage and peaceful protests.

It is hard to imagine anyone setting aside all of this and stripping away the emotion that Floyd’s death engendered for the sake of a fair hearing.

Chauvin’s attorney Eric J Nelson has repeatedly attempted to have the trial postponed and moved out of Hennepin County arguing just this point.

But the last pre-trial motion he brought was denied. According to Judge Cahill, while some of the details might be forgotten in time, he does not believe that pretrial publicity will stop until the trial is conducted – no matter what date in the future that might be.

As for a change of venue, he said: ‘I do not think that would give the defendant any kind of a fair trial beyond what we are doing here today. I don’t think there’s any place in the state of Minnesota that has not been subjected to extreme amounts of publicity on this case.’

The city’s $27million settlement in Floyd family’s civil suit only poured oil on that fire and threatened to derail jury selection when it was announced at the end of the first week of the process.

Judge Cahill could barely conceal his fury at the timing. Two of the jurors who had already been seated had to be excused having heard the news and admitted that they could no longer be impartial. And when prosecutors brought the matter up in court again the move prompted an outburst from the bench in which Judge Cahill told everyone, in no uncertain terms, to ‘stop talking about it’.

All of the 12 jurors and three alternates ultimately seated after a rigorous selection process that lasted just over two weeks said they had formed some opinion of both Chauvin and Floyd.

One black juror observed that when he watched the video he turned to his wife and said: “It could have been me.” Only one of the jurors seated claimed not to have viewed the video at all.

But each member of the jury – made-up of two white men, four white women, three black men, one black woman and two women who identify as multi-racial – swore that they can look at Chauvin, as he sits before them, and start at ground zero; presumption of innocence.

In Minnesota law the last three jurors seated – two white women and a white man – will act as alternates.

Both the defense and the prosecution have already had a series of important victories and setbacks in a flurry of pre-trial motions that have given some sense of the direction this trial can and will take.

The most important victory for the prosecution was the reinstatement of the third degree murder charge which had originally been discarded by Judge Cahill last August.

A damaging leak in the New York Times revealed that Chauvin had been prepared to plead guilty to this in return for a ten-year sentence in a plea deal agreement that only fell apart when the then Attorney General, William Barr, rejected it.

The most important victory for the defense was another reversal of an earlier decision by Judge Cahill. This time the decision was to permit jurors to hear details of a ‘strikingly similar’ prior arrest of Floyd on May 6, 2019.

With two conflicting autopsies the most highly contested issue in this case is cause of death and according to Nelson the details of that prior arrest go to the heart of it.

An independent autopsy conducted by Doctors Michael Baden and Allecia Wilson on behalf of Floyd’s family found cause of death to be ‘mechanical asphyxiation.’

But Hennepin County Medical Examiner gave cause of death as, ‘cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint and neck compression’.

Put bluntly, Nelson will argue that Floyd was not killed by Chauvin’s knee on his neck, but by a fistful of drugs that he swallowed in the moments of his arrest, sending his blood pressure skyrocketing. Nelson will use the prior arrest as proof that this rash act was Floyd’s ‘modus operandi’ and that he had done it before under almost identical circumstances.

The progression of that earlier arrest aligns almost exactly with the events of May 25, 2020.

In May 2019 Floyd was stopped in a car by an officer who drew his weapon, just as Lane did one year later. 

In May 2019 Floyd appeared panicked and non-compliant and told officers he couldn’t breathe, just as he did one year later, though back in 2019 he was not being violently restrained.

And in May 2019 he appeared to swallow seven or eight pills that were later found to be methamphetamine and fentanyl and caused his blood pressure to spike to 216 over 160. This hypertensive emergency put him at risk of stroke or heart attack and led to him being hospitalized.

According to Nelson this is what happened in 2020. A belated search of the squad car into which officers tried to wrestle Floyd found traces of white powder and a half-chewed pill that bore his DNA and proved to be methamphetamine and fentanyl.

Toxicology tests found that Floyd had 11 nanograms of fentanyl in his blood – a potentially lethal level though perhaps not, some experts have said, to an habitual user.

But whatever doubts the defense may seek to sow in the courtroom, there is no room for any down at the scene of Floyd’s death.

There, checkpoints have been set up and barriers block off traffic to an area now known as the Free State of George Floyd.

Some activists were openly hostile to media visiting on the eve of the trial demanding to know what organisations they represented and accusing them of exploiting a tragedy for money.

Each morning community organizers meet at the former Speedway gas station across from Cup Foods and now dubbed People’s Way. They gather around a central fire pit to discuss duties of the day; self-appointed security guards and custodians of the memorial that bloomed around the scene last spring and remains, amid increasing controversy.

Mayor Jacob Frey has expressed a desire to open the area up again but nothing will be touched until after the trial is over; until then Minneapolis holds its breath.

Loved ones gathered for a vigil honoring Floyd at the Greater Friendship Missionary Baptist Church in Minneapolis on Sunday. 

During the vigil Floyd’s brother Terrence Floyd collapsed as he spoke of his hopes that the trial would bring justice.  

‘We’re asking the system for the justice but this gathering we’re doing right now is what’s needed,’ Terrence said. ‘We’re gonna ask God for the justice. We need justice, we need it now!’   

Speaking at a brief press conference ahead of the vigil the Rev Al Sharpton declared that it is not only the former Minneapolis cop who will stand trial, but ‘the United States’ ability to deal with police accountability.’

In an emotional address he asked, ‘Is America prepared to hold police accountable and make them pay when they are wrong?’

Rev Sharpton was joined by Floyd family attorney Benjamin Crump at the event organized by the National Action Network on Sunday evening.  

He predicted a ‘painful and tumultuous’ few weeks for the dead man’s family who, he said, ‘now have to stand in front of the world and see over and over again,’ what he predicted would be defense efforts to, ‘discredit and smear’ Floyd.  

It was a sentiment echoed by Crump who said he fully expected Chauvin’s defense to ‘roll out the playbook’ when proceedings start Monday morning.

‘They’re going to attack his character so much they’re going to try to hope you forget what you saw in that video,’ he said.

Crump, who recently secured a $27million civil settlement for the family from the city, thanked those who ‘have said until we get justice for George Floyd we cannot breathe’. He added: ‘Perhaps at the end of this trial we can all exhale together.’ 

Floyd’s brother Philonise said that he thought of his brother ‘every day and every night’ and demanded a conviction for Chauvin.

‘I have a big hole in my heart. It can’t be patched up with money. We need a conviction,’ Philonise said. ‘I have faith that he will get convicted.’

Philonise described how his brother gasped for breath and cried out as Chauvin knelt on his neck.  

‘My brother complied,’ he said. ‘He said: “I can’t breathe.” He said: “Mama.” He said: “Tell my kids I love them”… Nobody should have to go through that, nobody should have to endure that.’

The final juror in Chauvin’s trial, a white man in his 20s who works an accountant, was chosen on Tuesday.

Attorneys and the judge worked through more than 100 people, dismissing most because they acknowledged strong views about an encounter that was captured on bystander video. 

The panel now includes 15 jurors. Twelve will deliberate, with two alternates; Hennepin County Judge Peter Cahill has said he will excuse the extra juror when opening statements begin on Monday if the 14 others still are able to serve. 

The final juror chosen is a married accountant who said he initially formed a somewhat negative opinion of Chauvin, saying it seemed like the length of his restraint on Floyd was longer than necessary. 

But he said he would be able to put that aside and weigh the case based on the evidence.

He said Floyd’s death sparked discussions about racism at work, and he decided to educate himself by reading a book about the subject. 

He said he has a healthy respect for police and views Black Lives Matter somewhat favorably. 

However, he said some of the frustrations boiled over and may have been a factor in violent unrest in Minneapolis.

He also said he understands that professional athletes who kneel during the national anthem are trying to start a dialogue on race, but ‘I would prefer if someone would express their beliefs in a different manner.’ 

Chauvin’s trial is being conducted amid the pandemic, with heightened risk for jurors to fall ill despite social distancing, mask-wearing and plastic shields in the courtroom.