572

View
comments

Boris Johnson insisted that British farmers could still benefit from Brexit today as he waded into a major Cabinet rift over an Australian trade deal that could flood the UK with cheap meat. 

The Prime Minister signalled his backing for Trade Secretary Liz Truss, who wants to give producers from Down Under tariff-free access to UK markets within a decade, saying it will lower costs for consumers.

But the move has sparked a furious ministerial row, with George Eustice, the Environment Secretary, who says the move on beef and lamb will undercut British farmers.  

Mr Johnson was grilled by SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackfrord at Prime Minister’s Questions, with the Scot accusing him of ‘planning to throw our farmers and crofters under the Brexit bus.’

Mr Johnson replied: ‘He is grossly underestimating the ability of the people of this country, the agricultural communities of this country, the farming industry to make the most of free trade. This is a country that grew successful and prosperous on free trade on exporting around the world.

‘Our food exports are second to none, he should be proud of that, we should be celebrating that and all he does is call for us to pull up the drawbridge and go back into the EU to be run by Brussels, that’s his manifesto and I think the people of this country have decisively rejected it.’      

Two factions have emerged within the Cabinet backing the two senior ministers, with Boris Johnson said to be backing Ms Truss. Lord Frost, the Brexit Minister, and Kwasi Kwarteng, the Business Secretary, are also in her camp.

Mr Eustice and his supporters  –  who include Michael Gove – have been labelled ‘Waitrose Tories’ and accused of wanting to prop up rich landowners at the expense of new Red Wall Tory voters, who would benefit from lower prices. 

Last night a source told the Sun: ‘I really don’t know why George Eustice even voted for Brexit if he does not want to take advantage of actually leaving the EU.’ 

Ms Truss is understood to be under pressure to grant tariff-free access for farmers in Australia and New Zealand in order to secure the new trade deals, but Mr Eustice is concerned that doing so could spark a backlash from the UK farming industry due to the impact of potential zero-tariff imports of lamb and beef.

She considers the first major post-Brexit trade deal a ‘crunch point’ with a desire to finalise it before June’s G7 conference in Cornwall. 

But she is facing opposition, with a source telling the Times: ‘There is worry across Whitehall about the principle of liberalisation and the precedent it will set. 

‘What we agree with Australia is likely to become a template for our negotiations with other countries and in particular America.’

Australia is said to be pushing for tariff-free access to UK food markets within five years under a post-Brexit trade agreement. 

Mr Eustice’s camp wants it to be pushed back to 15 years, but Ms Truss and Mr Johnson said to back 10 years.  

Yesterday Mr Eustice said the Government wants to do trade deals with other countries ‘but obviously on the right terms’. 

The Environment Secretary yesterday told Sky News: ‘We think there’s great opportunities, we’re very keen for instance to pursue trade agreements with Australia and also with the United States and with other countries as well.

‘But always in any trade agreement, yes there’s a balance to be struck between your commercial interests and your desire to open up free markets.’

He said there was a ‘balance to be struck’ between opening up trade and protecting domestic industries, a view shared by the National Farmers’ Union (NFU).

British farming will struggle to compete if zero-tariff trade on lamb and beef goes ahead, the president of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has said.

Following a meeting of the UK Farming Roundtable, which includes 19 farming bodies, NFU president Minette Batters said: ‘We know that if we’re to open up the opportunities of new markets overseas for UK farmers, we will have to offer greater access to our own markets in return.

‘However, this trade-off needs to be balanced, and we need to make sure concessions to our hugely valuable home market are not given away lightly.

‘There is a very real risk that, if we get it wrong, UK farming will suffer irreversible damage rather than flourish in the way we all desire, to the detriment of our environment, our food security and our rural communities.’

UK agriculture bosses have pointed out that cattle and sheep farming in Australia is often carried out on a much larger scale than in Britain – and to different standards.   

For example, the average beef herd size in the UK is between 28 to 50 cows, according to the National Farmers’ Union.

But a 2016 report published by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found that in northern Australia average herd size was 1,576 per farm.

The total number of sheep and lambs in the UK in 2015 was estimated at just over 33million while the Australian Bureau of Statistics put the number at 64million for Australian farms in June 2020. 

Tanya Steele, the chief executive of the WWF, said: ‘With nature in freefall and our climate in crisis, the Government has rightly committed to making sure British farming improves its environmental impact. 

‘A rushed trade deal with Australia could drive a coach and horses through those efforts, and provide a gateway into the UK for foods produced in ways that harm the environment.

‘Our future trading relationships can make us stronger, greener and more resilient, leading in the industries of the future, including sustainable farming. 

‘But not if we align ourselves with the laggards on climate and nature, inviting lower standards of production onto our shelves and exporting our environmental footprint, rather than reducing it.’

572

View
comments

Boris Johnson insisted that British farmers could still benefit from Brexit today as he waded into a major Cabinet rift over an Australian trade deal that could flood the UK with cheap meat. 

The Prime Minister signalled his backing for Trade Secretary Liz Truss, who wants to give producers from Down Under tariff-free access to UK markets within a decade, saying it will lower costs for consumers.

But the move has sparked a furious ministerial row, with George Eustice, the Environment Secretary, who says the move on beef and lamb will undercut British farmers.  

Mr Johnson was grilled by SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackfrord at Prime Minister’s Questions, with the Scot accusing him of ‘planning to throw our farmers and crofters under the Brexit bus.’

Mr Johnson replied: ‘He is grossly underestimating the ability of the people of this country, the agricultural communities of this country, the farming industry to make the most of free trade. This is a country that grew successful and prosperous on free trade on exporting around the world.

‘Our food exports are second to none, he should be proud of that, we should be celebrating that and all he does is call for us to pull up the drawbridge and go back into the EU to be run by Brussels, that’s his manifesto and I think the people of this country have decisively rejected it.’      

Two factions have emerged within the Cabinet backing the two senior ministers, with Boris Johnson said to be backing Ms Truss. Lord Frost, the Brexit Minister, and Kwasi Kwarteng, the Business Secretary, are also in her camp.

Mr Eustice and his supporters  –  who include Michael Gove – have been labelled ‘Waitrose Tories’ and accused of wanting to prop up rich landowners at the expense of new Red Wall Tory voters, who would benefit from lower prices. 

Last night a source told the Sun: ‘I really don’t know why George Eustice even voted for Brexit if he does not want to take advantage of actually leaving the EU.’ 

Ms Truss is understood to be under pressure to grant tariff-free access for farmers in Australia and New Zealand in order to secure the new trade deals, but Mr Eustice is concerned that doing so could spark a backlash from the UK farming industry due to the impact of potential zero-tariff imports of lamb and beef.

She considers the first major post-Brexit trade deal a ‘crunch point’ with a desire to finalise it before June’s G7 conference in Cornwall. 

But she is facing opposition, with a source telling the Times: ‘There is worry across Whitehall about the principle of liberalisation and the precedent it will set. 

‘What we agree with Australia is likely to become a template for our negotiations with other countries and in particular America.’

Australia is said to be pushing for tariff-free access to UK food markets within five years under a post-Brexit trade agreement. 

Mr Eustice’s camp wants it to be pushed back to 15 years, but Ms Truss and Mr Johnson said to back 10 years.  

Yesterday Mr Eustice said the Government wants to do trade deals with other countries ‘but obviously on the right terms’. 

The Environment Secretary yesterday told Sky News: ‘We think there’s great opportunities, we’re very keen for instance to pursue trade agreements with Australia and also with the United States and with other countries as well.

‘But always in any trade agreement, yes there’s a balance to be struck between your commercial interests and your desire to open up free markets.’

He said there was a ‘balance to be struck’ between opening up trade and protecting domestic industries, a view shared by the National Farmers’ Union (NFU).

British farming will struggle to compete if zero-tariff trade on lamb and beef goes ahead, the president of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has said.

Following a meeting of the UK Farming Roundtable, which includes 19 farming bodies, NFU president Minette Batters said: ‘We know that if we’re to open up the opportunities of new markets overseas for UK farmers, we will have to offer greater access to our own markets in return.

‘However, this trade-off needs to be balanced, and we need to make sure concessions to our hugely valuable home market are not given away lightly.

‘There is a very real risk that, if we get it wrong, UK farming will suffer irreversible damage rather than flourish in the way we all desire, to the detriment of our environment, our food security and our rural communities.’

UK agriculture bosses have pointed out that cattle and sheep farming in Australia is often carried out on a much larger scale than in Britain – and to different standards.   

For example, the average beef herd size in the UK is between 28 to 50 cows, according to the National Farmers’ Union.

But a 2016 report published by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found that in northern Australia average herd size was 1,576 per farm.

The total number of sheep and lambs in the UK in 2015 was estimated at just over 33million while the Australian Bureau of Statistics put the number at 64million for Australian farms in June 2020. 

Tanya Steele, the chief executive of the WWF, said: ‘With nature in freefall and our climate in crisis, the Government has rightly committed to making sure British farming improves its environmental impact. 

‘A rushed trade deal with Australia could drive a coach and horses through those efforts, and provide a gateway into the UK for foods produced in ways that harm the environment.

‘Our future trading relationships can make us stronger, greener and more resilient, leading in the industries of the future, including sustainable farming. 

‘But not if we align ourselves with the laggards on climate and nature, inviting lower standards of production onto our shelves and exporting our environmental footprint, rather than reducing it.’