Oklahoma passes nation’s most restrictive abortion bill banning terminations from FERTILIZATION

788

View
comments

Oklahoma has passed the most restrictive abortion law in the United States which bans terminations from the moment of fertilization, but lawmakers insist it does not apply to contraception including Plan B or IUDs.

The bill was given final approval by the state’s conservative-majority legislature on Thursday, and is now headed to GOP Governor Kevin Stitt. He has already indicated he will sign it.

The bill is part of an aggressive push in Republican-led states across the country to scale back abortion rights. It comes on the heels of a leaked draft opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court that suggests justices are considering weakening or overturning the landmark Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nearly 50 years ago.

The bill by Collinsville Republican Rep. Wendi Stearman would prohibit all abortions, except to save the life of a pregnant woman or if the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest that has been reported to law enforcement.

Vice President Kamala Harris was among those who condemned the new bill, branding it ‘outrageous.’ 

News of the bill sparked panic among women who feared they’d no longer be able to use popular methods of contraception including IUDs, or Plan B.

It is taken up to 72 hours after a sexual encounter which may have resulted in a pregnancy, meaning any woman who took the pill may be carrying a fertilized egg.

But Oklahoma lawmakers have insisted that Plan B has not been banned. Couples trying for a baby also feared the law outlawed IVF, but lawmakers say that is not the case. 

Stitt signed a so-called ‘heartbeat’ abortion bill earlier this year, modeled on Texas’s law. 

It will come into effect later this summer, and threatens anyone who performs an abortion on a fetus older than six weeks with up to 10 years in prison. 

‘Is our goal to defend the right to life or isn’t it?’ Stearman asked her colleagues before the bill passed on a 73-16 vote mostly along party lines.

The bill is one of at least three anti-abortion bills sent this year to Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, who has indicated he’ll sign it. 

Another Texas-style abortion bill that prohibits the procedure after cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo, which experts say is about six weeks, already has taken effect and has already dramatically curtailed the practice in Oklahoma.

Another bill set to take effect this summer would make it a felony to perform an abortion, punishable by up to 10 years in prison. That bill contains no exceptions for rape or incest.

Legal challenges to the bills already passed have been mounted, but they’ve yet to make any progress through Oklahoma’s courts. 

 ‘At this point, we are preparing for the most restrictive environment politicians can create: a complete ban on abortion with likely no exceptions,’ said Emily Wales, interim president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains.

It stopped providing abortions at two of its Oklahoma clinics after the six-week ban took effect earlier this month. ‘It´s the worst-case scenario for abortion care in the state of Oklahoma.’

Like the Texas law, the Oklahoma bill would allow private citizens to sue abortion providers or anyone who helps a woman obtain abortion. 

After the U.S. Supreme Court allowed that mechanism to remain in place, other Republican-led states sought to copy Texas´ ban. Idaho´s governor signed the first copycat measure in March, although it has been temporarily blocked by the state´s Supreme Court.

After Texas passed its bill last year, there was a dramatic reduction in the number of abortions performed in that state, with many women going to Oklahoma and other surrounding states for the procedure.

There are legal challenges pending in Oklahoma to both the bill to criminalize abortion and the six-week Texas ban, but the courts have so far failed to stop either measure.

Kamala Harris says overturning Roe v. Wade would be an assault on ‘the right to live and love’, threatens contraception and same-sex marriage and slams Oklahoma’s ‘outrageous’ law banning abortion at fertilization

Vice President Kamala Harris warned on Thursday that overturning the federal abortion protections granted by Roe v. Wade would be an assault on the right ‘to live and love without interference from the government.’

Just before Harris spoke, Oklahoma’s state House passed a bill that would ban abortions at conception. 

The vice president commented on the ‘outrageous’ nature of the legislation, noting that if passed it would be the strictest law against abortion in the country.

‘Just half an hour ago in Oklahoma, the state legislature passed one of the most extreme abortion bans in the country- a ban that would outlaw abortion from the moment of fertilization,’ Harris told reporters.

‘Think about that for a second: from the moment of fertilization. It’s outrageous, and it’s just the latest in a series of extreme laws around the country.’

Critics of the bill fear that conservative lawmakers’ next step would be banning contraception altogether. Oklahoma’s Republican Governor Kevin Stitt has signaled that he will sign the bill if it gets to his desk. 

Her meeting came amid heightened tensions in Washington, DC and across the country as the Supreme Court weighs overturning the federal abortion protections granted in the landmark decision Roe v. Wade.

Overturning Roe v. Wade would send the issue of abortion rights back to the states – 26 of which are likely to outlaw the medical procedure once possible. 

Harris said Thursday that it would be ‘the first time in the last 50 years, at least, that the court has recognized a Constitutional right only to take it away.’ 

‘This, when and if it happens, will be a an extreme step backward. And it represents a threat not just to women, but to all Americans. The right to privacy that forms the basis of Roe is the same right to privacy that protects the right to use contraception and the right to marry the person you love,’ the vice president said.

‘Overturning Roe opens the door to restricting those rights. It would be a direct assault on the fundamental right to self-determination, to live and love without interference from the government. 

‘At its core, this is about our future as a nation, about whether we live in a country where the government can interfere in personal decision.’

She added that overturning the landmark Supreme Court decision would ‘have real and immediate effects on women around our country.’ 

In a statement before the meeting, the White House said: ‘The Vice President will hear stories from abortion providers who are working in states with some of the most extreme abortion restrictions, and she will thank them for fighting to protect reproductive health care, despite personal risk.’

The administration said she would ’emphasize that the Administration will continue to defend women’s constitutional rights and protect access to abortion.’

The four abortion providers Harris is meeting with are: California, Oklahoma and Kansas-based physician Dr. Rebecca Taub; Dr. Bhavik Kumar,  from Planned Parenthood in Texas; Dr. Colleen McNicholas, the chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood in St. Louis, Missouri; and Helen Weems, founder of All Families Healthcare in Montana.

The event is the White House’s latest attempt to show solidarity with pro-choice Americans amid a largely partisan battle over abortion rights.

The Biden-Harris administration has been putting out forceful statements in support of abortion rights, but has few legal avenues to act unilaterally to protect those rights.

An attempt to codify pro-choice legislation died in the Senate when Democrat failed to clinch the necessary 60 votes. 

Moderate West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin voted along with Republicans to kill the bill. 

Earlier this month, a draft Supreme Court opinion over Mississippi’s case against its last abortion provider ignited a firestorm on both sides of the aisle when it was handed to Politico by an anonymous leaker.

The draft, which was confirmed to be authentic, indicates the high court’s conservative supermajority may be poised to overturn federal abortion rights – something Mississippi prosecutors have asked for, along with lowering the limit for the procedure to 15 weeks rather than the 24-week viability line.

Harris, who attended last week’s vote as a symbolic gesture of support for pro-choice Democrats, condemned the vote in the Senate chamber.

‘This vote clearly suggests that the Senate is not where the majority of Americans are on this issue,’ the vice president said.

‘A priority for all that care about this issue – the priority – should be to elect pro-choice leaders.’

With few other options to codify abortion rights on a nationwide level, Democrats have primarily focused their messaging on getting voters out to elect more progressive candidates. 

After the failed vote, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer urged Americans to ‘elect more pro-choice Democrats if you want to protect a woman’s freedom and right to choose.’ 

He added: ‘Elect more MAGA Republicans if you want to see a nationwide ban on abortion, if you want to see doctors and women arrested, if you want to see no exceptions for rape or incest.’

Republicans, however, have sought to paint Democrats as extremists seeking unrestricted abortion rights – and expressed outrage over the leaker’s violation of Supreme Court privacy.

One conservative lawmaker, Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana, clashed with an abortion provider at a tense hearing on access to the medical procedure on Wednesday.

‘So I would love for you to explain to us, in your medical opinion, at what point in pregnancy should having an abortion no longer be an option?’ the conservative asked.

Dr. Yashica Robinson explained that ‘every pregnancy is unique and different’ and that ‘patients need to have access to care’ on a case-by-case basis.

Johnson cut her off, ‘Let me let me ask you – do you support the right of a woman who’s just seconds away from birthing a healthy child to have an abortion?’

‘I think that the question that you’re asking does not realistically reflect abortion care,’ Robinson answered.

Johnson  later insisted that ‘it happens,’ adding: ‘How about if a child is halfway out of the birth canal? Is an abortion permissible then?’

Robinson, visibly stunned, replied: ‘I can’t even fathom that.’

‘I’m not asking you to fathom it, if it occurred, would you support that abortion or not? That’s unrestricted abortion, right?’ the Louisiana Republican questioned.

‘I can’t answer a question that I can’t imagine,’ Robinson insisted.

‘Just like you probably can’t imagine what you would do if your daughter was raped. If it hasn’t happened it may be difficult