Unions and scientists claim Boris is moving ‘too far, too soon’ as rules set to be gone in fortnight

721

View
comments

Boris Johnson today came under fire for declaring that he intends to ditch all remaining Covid laws within a fortnight as unions criticised the move as going ‘too far, too soon’ and Government advisers warned of the ‘dangers’.

The Prime Minister yesterday dramatically declared the final domestic restrictions – including compulsory self-isolation for the infected – will be axed before the end of February, provided the ‘encouraging’ trends in the data continue.

Covid infections are falling consistently and deaths are now in freefall, while the milder nature of Omicron, coupled with sky-high levels of immunity, mean the NHS never came under the levels of pressure that No10’s experts feared.

Ministers have repeatedly spoken of their plans to live with Covid like flu, paving the way for England to lead the rest of the world out of the pandemic phase. But the embattled PM’s statement yesterday – which was greeted with roars by Tory MPs in the Commons – has drawn criticism. 

Current restrictions have left tens of thousands of Britons off work every day, with 80 per cent of the 70,000 people testing positive daily sticking to the rules that orders them to isolate for at least five days. 

The rules caused one in 11 teachers to be off school due to the virus last week. 

But Christina McAnea, Unisons’s general secretary, said: ‘Everybody wants to get back to normal, but Covid risks haven’t disappeared. ​This is going too far, ​way too soon.

‘Infections are still rife in schools​. Large numbers of pupils ​and staff are off​. Allowing ​a ​premature return could lead to a further jump in infections and disrupt learning for thousands more ​children and young people.’

And Professor John Edmunds said SAGE, No10’s scientific advisers, ‘haven’t discussed’ ending quarantine and there are ‘of course dangers’ to the Prime Minister’s plan.

He said: ‘This restriction is the last one and quite rightly so. 

‘If you think about what it does, it targets those who are actually infectious with the virus and asks them to stay at home.’ 

Epidemiologist ProfessorTim Spector warned relaxing Covid curbs is a ‘political type of statement rather than a scientific one’.

Meanwhile, a YouGov poll of nearly 5,000 Britons shows 75 per cent of people believe the self-isolation requirement should be in place for at least the next few months. 

Oxford scientist Professor Melinda Mills said people are less likely to follow Government advice when trust is low and it’s not clear that scientific evidence is being followed.

It comes as the gap between Covid curbs in England and Scotland continues to grow as restrictions could stay in the country for another six months.

Laws making face masks and Covid passes compulsory which were due to expire on February 28 now look set to be pushed back to September 24. Scottish ministers will continue to assess the rules every three weeks, with the next review on February 22.

Deputy First Minister John Swinney insisted that it was important to keep options on the table, just hours after Mr Johnson announced an end to the last domestic Covid curbs in England and the pandemic in the country.

In more drama at Westminster:

A health minister is facing calls to resign after continuing with a meeting with bereaved parents despite being informed she had tested positive; A new photograph has emerged of Mr Johnson hosting a Downing Street quiz via zoom during lockdown, with a bottle of bubbly visible;There are signs that Brits are becoming increasingly confident the pandemic is ending with holiday companies reporting a spike in bookings;  Keir Starmer tackled the PM over fraud and energy bills but ignored the raging row over Mr Johnson’s Jimmy Savile ‘slur’ from last week. 

Asked on ITV’s Peston last night whether SAGE has discussed the move to lift all remaining Covid requirements in England, Professor Edmunds said: ‘We haven’t discussed it there.

‘Of course he gets scientific advice from elsewhere as well. The UKHSA [UK Health Security Agency] and others. So he may have had other scientific advice but not that I’m aware of.’

On whether there are dangers to Mr Johnson’s plans, Professor Edmunds added: ‘Yes of course there are dangers. There are dangers when you lift any restriction.

‘This restriction is the last one and quite rightly so. If you think about what it does, it targets those who are actually infectious with the virus and asks them to stay at home.’ 

Professor Spector, who runs the Zoe app Covid study at King’s College London, said relaxing coronavirus rules is a political statement intended to show that Britain is the first country moving out of the pandemic.

He told Times Radio this morning: ‘This is more a political type of statement rather than a scientific one, and I think we have to really look at this in the context, both of politics and science, and also what’s happening, because there is some rationale to this and other countries are doing things similar.

‘But it’s clearly a race for the Government to say that Britain is first, Britain is the first to come out of this, Britain has conquered Omicron, our booster programme is world beating etc, etc.

‘But I think what they’re relying on is data that is highly disputed scientifically that, really, the UK has come out of this faster and better than anyone else.’

He said hospital admissions and deaths are down but the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Zoe data show the UK is still at more than 200,000 cases a day ‘and we’re still close to where we were on January 1 and that peak we had’.

He added: ‘It’s definitely not over – your risk of getting it is huge – and to suddenly give the wrong message… by saying ‘We’re getting rid of all restrictions, if you’ve got an infection don’t bother isolating’, which is sort of implied but not said, that is totally wrong.

‘So, other countries might be doing this, but they have a much stronger public health message and a much better-educated public about the pandemic which we lack here in this country.’

Professor Tim Spector said other countries will stick with four or five days of isolation.

‘They won’t be saying to everyone “Don’t bother, just go and infect your workmates”, which seems crazy,’ he said.

Asked if Mr Johnson’s announcement was ‘an act of irresponsibility’, he said: ‘I think it is… giving the impression that Britain, that the UK, has beaten Covid, I think it’s totally the wrong way to do it.’

A YouGov poll suggests the majority of Britons are against the Prime Minister’s plans and believe infected Britons should be forced to isolate.

The data firm quizzed 4,451 Britons on whether they think people should be legally required to self-isolate if they test positive for Covid. 

Nearly half (48 per cent) said the requirement should always be in place, while 27 per cent said it should be legally required for the ‘next few months’. But 17 per cent said people should not be ordered to stay at home when they test positive.

Professor Mills, head of sociology at Oxford University, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that people are less likely to follow Government advice when trust is low.

Asked about whether lockdown rule-breaking at No10, she said: ‘The research has shown that when trust is really low, that people feel that there’s not clear following scientific evidence or following advice or engaging in role modelling, then people are less apt to listen.’

Professor Mills said the person who is giving the message is important, as is avoiding mixed messaging.

She said: ‘We had the announcement yesterday and the first thing that people want to know (is), well, what’s changed? What sort of scientific evidence is there that’s changed? 

‘And there’ll be an evaluation on February 21. You know, what is that evaluation? What kind of yardstick will be used?

‘We know that hospital admissions are down, but infection levels are still actually very high.’

Both the Scottish and UK governments are to set out their long-term plans for living with fewer restrictions after the coming week of recess at Holyrood and Westminster. But while Mr Johnson hinted that curbs could come to an end early if case numbers fall, the SNP government has moved to extend the period in which they might continue to apply.

Mr Swinney said ministers ‘believe it is necessary to retain the availability of these baseline measures for now while we review our ongoing response to Covid’.

He added: ‘The Government is committed to regularly reviewing these regulations, as we are required to, and the continued removal of any measures considered no longer necessary.’ 

However, yet another rift appears to be opening up between Mr Johnson and Miss Sturgeon response, with a spokeswoman for the Scottish Government saying that the UK Government ‘failed to provide devolved nations with appropriate notice to consider implications ahead of the announcement by the Prime Minister’.

She said Scottish ministers are urgently seeking clarity from the UK Government to consider any implications its announcement could have for Scotland, adding: ‘Regardless of decisions made by the UK Government, it is vital that Scotland can continue to access funding to support the policy decisions taken in Scotland in response to Covid-19.’

Last week, Miss Sturgeon left the country’s Covid measures unchanged, including enforced mask wearing by schoolchildren, telling Holyrood a ‘significant fall’ in infection levels the country has seen in recent weeks had now ‘levelled off’.

She told MSPs a meeting of her cabinet had decided that the remaining baseline measures would stay in place ‘for now’. But she is facing pressure from the Scottish Tories, who yesterday called for the scaling down of Test and Protect, a phased end to all legal restrictions and a new levels system which will be aligned to data on the virus.

Both Miss Sturgeon and Labour’s Mark Drakeford in Wales have been far more cautious about removing curbs. The Scottish First Minister is due to release her plan for living with Covid later this month — but Mr Drakeford has not revealed whether he will follow the PM’s lead.

Despite the array of promising figures and milder nature of Omicron having changed the course of the pandemic, Mr Johnson was warned not to scrap Covid rules to ‘get out of a hole’. Scientists also voiced ‘surprise’ and said the government could be making a ‘profound mistake’ by giving up tools to track the virus.

The PM — who had already said he wanted the rules to expire naturally on March 24 — made the dramatic announcement at the start of PMQs in the Commons. The step was greeted with roars in the chamber, with many Tories having been pushing for the Government to draw a line under the pandemic with the country having been subject to virtually unprecedented peacetime restrictions since early 2020. Plan B requirements for people to work from home where possible was dropped last month, along with most face mask rules and compulsory Covid passes.

Labour leader Keir Starmer insisted he is holding back on whether the restrictions should be eased, but shadow health minister Justin Madders made clear the party needs convincing that the step is ‘a result of scientific advice and not based on protecting his political position’.

The news could give Mr Johnson a much-needed boost as he battles to cling on amid damaging Partygate allegations.

Lord Frost, who dramatically quit Cabinet partly in protest at draconian curbs, was among the senior Tories praising the move. ‘The PM’s plan to end all Covid restrictions a month early is the right thing to do & is extremely welcome. I hope the government will also make clear we will not go down the road of coercive lockdowns ever again,’ he tweeted.

Tory MPs last night insisted that lockdowns should never be deployed again. ‘I am glad to see the emphasis on learning to live with Covid,’ said Bob Seely, who represents the Isle of Wight. 

‘We now need a grown-up and sensible approach setting out how we will protect the vulnerable in future without the enormous cost of locking down the rest of society. We know Covid may return this autumn or winter, but it would be indefensible to lock down again.’

David Jones, a former Cabinet minister, welcomed the ‘very positive’ news, adding: ‘The PM deserves credit for this. We have locked down for too long and we now need a commitment that we will not lock down again, save for in the most exceptional of circumstances.’

As Scotland moves into what will hopefully be a ‘calmer phase of the pandemic’, figures on new cases, hospitalisations and vaccinations will no longer be reported at the weekend, the First Minister said, with this coming weekend being the last that this data will be provided.

And while she stressed the situation was now more positive, Miss Sturgeon also said that taking ‘continued care and caution’ was both ‘necessary and prudent’.

A specialist group is meeting on Tuesday to consider if children in secondary schools should continue to to wear face masks — with Miss Sturgeon pledging the Government will ‘consider carefully’ the advice on this issue.

A decision will be confirmed ‘as quickly as possible and in advance of the return to school after the February break,’ she added.

Meanwhile, a senior adviser has insisted Scotland is ‘not close’ to the end of the Covid pandemic, although it is ‘getting close to the end’ of the Omicron wave.

National clinical director, Professor Jason Leith, said he was ‘very hopeful’ about the current coronavirus situation. But he also stressed that the World Health Organisation had estimated that the pandemic was only ‘about half way through’.

Describing the situation as being ‘much more positive’ than it was at the start of the year, the First Minister told MSPs that her Government will publish a new strategic framework for dealing with Covid on February 22.

Despite this, Prof Leitch said it was impossible to rule out another lockdown if a new, potentially more severe variant of the virus emerged.

An infection survey released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed Covid-19 infection levels have risen in most parts of the UK, with only Wales showing a clear week-on-week fall.

In England around one in 19 people in private households are estimated to have had the virus in the week to February 5, or 2.8 million people — up from one in 20, or 2.6 million people, in the week to January 29, though the ONS describes the trend as ‘uncertain’.

Northern Ireland saw infections continuing to increase week-on-week, from one in 15 people to one in 13 — the highest since records began — while in Scotland the estimate is up from one in 30 to one in 25.

In Wales, around one in 25 people is estimated to have had Covid-19 last week, down from one in 20 the previous week. However, more up-to-date official Covid statistics last night showed cases and hospitalisations falling again.

Government dashboard data showed there were 66,183 new positive tests logged over the last 24 hours, down 41.1 per cent on the 112,458 recorded last week.

It was the lowest daily infection figure on a Tuesday since December 14 — towards the start of the Omicron wave. 

The number of people admitted to hospital with the virus also fell, dropping 12.8 per cent to 1,421 on February 3, the latest date data is available for.

But deaths increased for the first time in six days, increasing 43.4 per cent from 314 last week to 219. 

The number represents how many deaths were recorded in 24 hours — not the total that actually occurred. 

Covid deaths by day of occurrence have been dropping for more than a week, as the UK continue to emerge from the winter wave.

Downing Street said it would never recommend anyone go to work when they have an infectious disease.

Asked if the change would mean people could go to work if they had Covid, the PM’s official spokesman said: ‘So there would be guidance, that would not be what we are recommending.

‘What we would simply be doing is removing the domestic regulations which relate to isolation.

‘But obviously in the same way that someone with flu, we wouldn’t recommend they go to work, we would never recommend anyone goes to work when they have an infectious disease.’

He added: ‘We’ve talked about how we will need to manage living with coronavirus as we emerge from this pandemic. We are entering into that phase of endemicity as I’ve talked about, and it’s only right that we adjust according.’

The spokesman said the announcement ‘shows that the hard work of the British people is paying off’.

‘This would represent an important step for this country as we move out of the pandemic,’ they said.

‘And it is thanks to the British people who stepped up when needed – both at the start of the vaccination programme and the booster programme over Christmas, we saw people come forward in huge numbers very quickly.

‘And it’s that level of protection that has meant that we are able to emerge much faster.

‘It is a boon both for the public – we are able to restore freedoms – but also to our hard-hit businesses, particularly hospitality, enabling our economy to grow further.

‘It shows that the hard work of the British people is paying off.’ 

The PM’s press secretary said businesses would be given a ‘wide range of guidance’ on how to treat employees following the removal of the Covid self-isolation requirement. 

The plan will also set out what arrangements will be in place for international travel, Downing Street said.

‘The living with Covid strategy will address the future of the Coronavirus Act 2020, which is due for review by March 25, 2022,’ the Prime Minister’s official spokesman told reporters.

‘That covers the remaining non-domestic regulations on international travel, so that’s things like the passenger locator forms and tests for the unvaccinated.’

Asked if those rules would remain in place until the end of March, the spokesman said ‘we will obviously make a decision when we get to that stage’.

A spokesman for Sir Keir said: ‘All Keir heard was the one sentence at the start of PMQs. We will be looking for a lot more detail before we comment on that.

‘We will judge it, as we always have, on the science. Let’s see what the plan says when it appears, rather than the Prime Minister’s comments in the chamber.’

Lockdown-sceptic Tories gave the announcement a broad welcome, but said they wanted to see the detail.

One MP said: ‘We have now protected everyone who wants a vaccination so this new strategy must mean turning the page and living with Covid.’

Former minister Steve Baker added: ‘I welcome this announcement but we are not out of the woods until the Public Health Act has been reformed, we have new rules for better modelling, competitive, multi-disciplinary expert advice and wellbeing-based cost-benefit analysis covering the costs of lockdowns and restrictions. There is much to do!’

Lib Dem MP Layla Moran said: ‘As they have repeatedly done throughout this pandemic, this government is preparing to make a serious public health decision for short term political expediency.

‘There will come a time when we need to live with coronavirus but dropping all precautions with no medical basis is foolhardy when the risk of new variants remains and long covid continues to cause shortages in vital public services.

‘Ministers must not play fast and loose with people’s health in an attempt to meet political demands.’ 

Stephen Griffin from the school of medicine at the University Leeds said: ‘In my view, the way in which this is being implemented is a profound mistake. Again.

‘Literally blinding ourselves by removing testing and isolation robs us of the most fundamental means of controlling the spread of this virus.’

UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea said: ‘Everybody wants to get back to normal, but Covid risks haven’t disappeared. This is going too far, way too soon.’ 

Prof Paul Hunter, Professor in Medicine at the University of East Anglia, said the PM’s statement was ‘quite a surprise’. 

‘At some point it is going to be the case that all remaining restrictions are dropped including the need to self-isolate, though I certainly didn’t expect that to happen this month,’ he said.

‘There are grounds for optimism. After a temporary stalling in the rate of decline in reported cases case numbers have once again started to fall. 

‘This recent decline has been most dramatic in children where in England reported case number in children aged 5 to 9 cases have almost halved in a week. 

‘Hospital admissions and ITU bed occupancy continue to fall and deaths are also now falling. However, there remains concern about the omicron variant known as BA.2 which does seem to be still increasing in the most recent data, albeit a little slower than previously.

‘The concern for me remains our more vulnerable people, especially those who for medical reasons may not have responded as well to vaccine as we would have wished. There needs to be robust procedures in place to ensure infections in this group are diagnosed early and antivirals are provided within hours of any positive result.’ 

Prof Hunter also argued that vaccinations for younger children should not happen because it is ‘past the point’ where they would make much difference.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘I would lean against offering it to this age group for a number of reasons, particularly although you’ve said we’ve seen very high infection rates in children in recent weeks, they’re actually falling really quickly at the moment.

‘And we’re seeing fewer than half the cases in this age group even little more than a week ago, so I think in many ways we’re past the point where vaccines are actually going to make much difference.’ 

Ministers have been increasingly balancing the impact on the workforce from Covid absences against the need to stop the spread. 

Mr Javid last week performed a last-minute U-turn on the controversial ‘no jab, no job’ policy for health workers over fears it would leave hospitals short staffed. 

Up to 80,000 unjabbed workers faced being fired because of the rule, which would have meant they needed two doses by April 1 to keep their job. 

Meanwhile, there have been calls for the daily Covid updates to be scrapped as ‘official’ deaths are over-blowing the daily toll by two-fifths.

Latest figures from the UK Health Security Agency — which count deaths as those within 28 days of a positive test — show 1,663 fatalities were registered in England and Wales during the week ending January 28.

But looking at the data by the number of death certificates mentioning the virus, however, shows there were only 1,385 logged.

And if the data is broken down to show where the virus was the underlying cause of death, only 986 were posted — 40 per cent below the official tally.

The rise of the milder Omicron strain has led to a similar pattern emerging in hospitals, where half of virus inpatients are not primarily needing treatment for the infection.

Critics have warned that the rise in so-called ‘incidental’ cases, driven by the sheer prevalence of Omicron, is skewing the Government’s daily coronavirus statistics.

Dame Irene Hays, owner of travel agent Hays Travel, said the company has seen a ‘huge spike’ in appetite for holidays.

She told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘In fact in the last week of January we were back to the same levels of bookings as we were in January 2020.’

Spain, Turkey, Greece and the USA are popular destinations, she said, adding that people are also choosing destinations much further afield.

The average price per booking is also up by about £482 ‘because people just want to spend more on themselves, they want to go all inclusive and they want to stay a little bit longer’.

Dame Irene said ‘huge numbers’ are returning to the high street to book holidays, adding that 56 per cent of customers are new to Hays Travel compared to 2019 when the number was about 19 per cent.

‘They want to speak to human being, they want to get to know them, they want to make sure that they’re getting the best advice before they book, but they also need to know that somebody will be there for them while they’re on their holiday and when they return,’ she said.

Scotland Yard will start quizzing more than 50 people over Partygate THIS WEEK: Met Police launches Operation Hillman as chiefs review decision not to include Christmas ‘quiz’ amid new picture of Boris with champagne and crisps

Scotland Yard will begin quizzing more than 50 people suspected of taking part in alleged lockdown-busting parties in Downing Street and Whitehall during the pandemic this week, it has emerged.

Officers from Operation Hillman will send formal questionnaires to more than 50 people, starting by the end of this week, in relation to eight dates that are being investigated between May 20, 2020 and April 16, 2021.

Sue Gray’s interim report last week disclosed that police were investigating 12 different events in No 10 and Whitehall over the course of 2020 and 2021 for possible breaches of Covid rules. They include the notorious ‘bring your own booze’ event in the Downing Street garden in May 2020 attended by Mr Johnson and a gathering in the Prime Minister’s official flat in November 2020.

The Met said the Operation Hillman special inquiry team was continuing to examine more than 500 documents and 300 images provided to them by the Cabinet Office and would be seeking further information to assist their inquiry.

It warned that there may be a need to contact further people in the coming days and weeks should they be identified as having taken part in an event that potentially breached regulations.

‘This document, which asks for an account and explanation of the recipient’s participation in an event, has formal legal status and must be answered truthfully,’ the Metropolitan Police said.

‘Recipients are informed that responses are required within seven days. In most cases contact is being made via email.’ 

Boris Johnson’s Partygate drama deepened further today after it emerged that police are reviewing whether a Christmas quiz at No10 may have breached coronavirus restrictions after a picture emerged showing the PM and colleagues near an open bottle of sparkling wine. 

Scotland Yard said that officers were reconsidering their previous assessment that the event on December 15, 2020 did not meet the threshold for criminal investigation after the new evidence emerged.

The Mirror published a photo showing the Prime Minister and three members of staff — one wearing tinsel and another in a Santa hat — near what appears to be an uncorked bottle of prosecco and an open bag of crisps.

Downing Street insists the event was a ‘virtual quiz’ and police had decided not to investigate it alongside 12 other events after being passed evidence from the Sue Gray inquiry into alleged lockdown breaches.

But the Metropolitan Police said in a statement on Wednesday: ‘The MPS previously assessed this event and determined that on the basis of the evidence available at that time, it did not meet the threshold for criminal investigation. That assessment is now being reviewed.’ 

The development suggests the latest image to surface was not among more than 300 passed to officers by the Whitehall investigation, and adds to the pressure on Mr Johnson after major Tory donor John Armitage suggested his leadership is past the point of no return.

Battling to stay in power in the face of Conservative unrest over partygate, Mr Johnson signalled to the Commons that laws requiring people in England with Covid-19 to self-isolate will be lifted within weeks.

But the Mirror publishing its latest photo during Prime Minister’s Questions prompted a challenge from shadow minister Fabian Hamilton.

The Labour MP said the image appears to show ‘one of the Christmas parties he told us never happened’, adding: ‘Will the Prime Minister be referring this party to the police as it is not one of the ones currently being investigated?’.

Mr Johnson responded: ‘In what he has just said, I’m afraid he is completely in error.’

Challenged again during PMQs, Mr Johnson added: ‘That event already has been submitted for investigation.’

Tory MP Neil Hudson called for all the evidence to be published to stem the ‘drip, drip, drip’ of alleged Covid breaches and ‘upsetting images’, in a sign the revelation was further damaging Conservatives’ view of Mr Johnson.

‘I’m incredibly disappointed and upset. Yet again I have to say that categorically I will not defend the indefensible,’ the Penrith and The Border MP told GB News.

‘I’m very clear that if rules have been broken, and indeed if the law has been broken, it doesn’t matter how serious you are, there has to be serious consequences.’

London was under Tier 2 restrictions at the time, which prohibited social mixing between different households indoors. Official guidance said: ‘Although there are exemptions for work purposes, you must not have a work Christmas lunch or party, where that is a primarily social activity and is not otherwise permitted by the rules in your tier.’

Miss Gray’s update on her inquiry revealed that police were investigating 12 events in Downing Street and wider government, but the ‘online Christmas quiz’ was not considered to have ‘reached the threshold for criminal investigation’.

Dominic Cummings, Mr Johnson’s hostile former chief adviser, tweeted ‘there’s waaaaay better pics than that floating around’, including of inside Mr Johnson’s official Downing Street flat.

A separate image of the same quiz emerged in December but did not show any alcohol.

Adam Wagner, a human rights lawyer who has been examining Covid laws, said it ‘seems obvious’ from the new photo that Mr Johnson is ‘participating in a social gathering’.

The Prime Minister’s press secretary insisted the event was a ‘virtual quiz’ but was unable to say whether the photograph had been submitted to the Gray inquiry.

‘I’m not going to get into precise evidence but she obviously had access to all the evidence she needed,’ the press secretary said.

It came after Mr Armitage, who has given more than £3million to the Conservative Party, said leaders should quit if they lose their ‘moral authority’ and called ‘the lack of honour inherent in modern politics incredibly distressing’.

Asked by the BBC if he thinks Mr Johnson’s leadership is past the point of no return, the financier said: ‘Personally, yes.’  

The Liberal Democrats said the new image confirms ‘what we already know — Boris Johnson is not fit to be Prime Minister’.

The party’s home affairs spokesman Alistair Carmichael said: ‘These new images confirm what we already know — Boris Johnson is not fit to be Prime Minister.

‘The Met Police must add this to the long list of rule-breaking parties to investigate without delay.

‘Conservative MPs must also look themselves in the mirror and do the patriotic thing by calling on Boris Johnson to resign.

‘Everyday the Prime Minister stays in office is an insult to those who endured such hardship during the pandemic.’

SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford claimed Mr Johnson was ‘staggering from one scandal to the next’ and said the PM’s position is ‘completely untenable’.

Tory health minister Gillian Keegan apologises for ‘error of judgement’ after she continued meeting with three bereaved fathers despite testing positive for Covid on lateral flow 

Tory health minister Gillian Keegan has apologised for an ‘error of judgement’ after continuing a meeting despite testing positive for Covid-19. 

The MP for Chichester took a ‘precautionary’ lateral flow test ahead of a planned visit at Westminster yesterday with Mike Palmer, Andy Airey and Tim Owen, who lost their daughters to suicide.

She received a positive result during the meeting but, instead of leaving to self-isolate, briefly continued with the bereaved fathers’ consent.

The minister for care and mental health has now recognised she should have immediately ended the visit, saying: ‘This was an error of judgment on my part.’

Her comments sparked a huge backlash online, as one resident of her constituency branded her actions ‘appalling’ while others questioned why she attended the meeting without knowing the result. 

Health Secretary Sajid Javid has accepted Ms Keegan’s apology and ‘continues to support her in her role’.

In the event of a positive test result, the NHS website says you must self-isolate ‘straight away’.

In a thread on Twitter published last night, Ms Keegan wrote: ‘Earlier today, ahead of a planned visit I took a precautionary LFD test which gave a positive result. I am now isolating at home and fortunately feel fine.

‘When I was told my test was positive I was listening to three fathers who had tragically lost their daughters to suicide. 

‘I told them the result and took further precautions but with their consent, I stayed for a short period to hear their stories. 

‘I should have immediately ended the meeting and on reflection this was an error of judgment on my part. 

‘I fully recognise the importance of following the letter and spirit of the policies, so want to be upfront about what happened and to apologise for the mistake I made.’ 

A spokesman for Mr Javid said: ‘The Secretary of State has spoken with the minister who has taken responsibility for her actions and made a full apology.

‘He accepts her apology and continues to support her in her role.’

And asked what he would say to Ms Keegan, health minister Ed Argar told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: ‘I saw that Twitter thread, I think, late last night, I think it was. 

‘She’s clearly issued a fulsome apology there, that she did make an error of judgment, she was open about that and she accepted she made an error of judgment.’ 

He added: ‘I understand – I haven’t spoken to or seen Gillian yesterday or today, so I don’t know first hand – but I understand from her Twitter thread that she set out the circumstances and apologised, and I understand that she has also spoken to and apologised to the Secretary of State, who has accepted that apology.’ 

But social media users criticised the health minister’s ‘reckless’ decision, with one person writing: ‘I am a member of your constituency, and I find this behaviour appalling. 

‘As a school teacher I, like many, LFD at least twice per week. I do it in plenty of time, so I know I’ve tested negative before I go near any students or other staff. Wait for your result.’

Another posted: ‘Why did you do an LFT and go into a meeting without knowing the result?’

A third added: ‘How is it that you guys get to say a meaningless sorry on Twitter and we get fined if we break the rules!’

And a fourth commented: ‘This was very reckless, you should have taken the test before you decided to travel’, adding: ‘How many others did you put at risk beforehand?’