Trump, in a reversal, tells allies he is interested in a broad stimulus
The person stressed it’s unclear what, exactly, Trump’s vision of a comprehensive deal would entail and there remains significant hurdles — and skepticism — when it comes to reaching an agreement through talks that have been largely stuck in the same place for several months.
The development marks the completion of a head-spinning 48 hours. Trump, on Tuesday, took to Twitter to call off the stimulus talks entirely, sending markets into a dive. Eight hours later he called for piecemeal legislation to address the economic hardship created by the coronavirus pandemic — something Democrats have repeatedly rejected. By Wednesday night, Mnuchin called Pelosi and said the President was interested in coming back to the table, according to a person familiar with their conversation.
Throughout the last few days, White House officials have said repeatedly that negotiations on a comprehensive deal were over and the preferred pathway was a series of smaller-scale bills.
Now, the President is once again open to a bigger deal.
“Let’s take a serious, not a skinny, not an emaciated but a serious appropriate approach, to crushing the virus,” Pelosi told reporters.
“The discussion from day to day can be confusing for all of us to follow,” McConnell said of the roller-coaster that has been stimulus talks over the last several weeks. The Kentucky Republican has long said he’s in favor of another rescue package, but has also made clear the differences between the two sides remain significant.
“We do agree that another rescue package is needed,” McConnell said Thursday. “We have vast differences about how much we should spend.”
Pelosi, for months, has made clear that the scale of the crisis — both on the economic and public health side of things — requires significant investment and the House passed a $2.2 trillion measure last week. Senate Republicans proposed a roughly $500 billion bill last month, which was blocked by Senate Democrats.
Mnuchin had put roughly $1.6 trillion on the table in the negotiations Trump short-circuited this week, but multiple people involved said Pelosi had made clear she was not going below $2 trillion given her view of the scale of the problems that needed to be addressed.
But beyond the need to reach an agreement on the topline number, the actual details and legislative language of a comprehensive agreement also remain far from completion, and would likely represent the most complex part of any negotiation.