ISIS Beatles CAN face trial in America: Terror suspect’s mother loses latest High Court evidence bid
ISIS Beatles CAN face trial in America: Terror suspect’s mother loses High Court bid to stop pair’s prosecution in US – meaning they face life in ‘hell on earth’ supermax prison if convicted
- Alexanda Kotey, 36, and El-Shafee El-Sheikh, 32, were allegedly in terror cell
- ‘Beatles’ were behind beheading of two British aid workers and two journalists
- Sheikh’s mother had challenged initial decision to share information in case
- She attempted numerous legal attempts to stop the material being sent to US
- But High Court ruled this morning the information supply could continue
- An order stopping the UK evidence being sent has now been lifted by judges
A last gasp challenge which could have stopped the British ISIS Beatles facing justice in America has been thrown out of the High Court this morning.
Maha Elgizouli, whose son El Shafee Elsheikh is in US custody with his co-accused Alexanda Kotey, brought a judicial review earlier this month over Priti Patel‘s decision on August 24 to provide material to the American government under a “mutual legal assistance (MLA)” request.
It saw the court initially making an order stopping the Secretary of State from providing any further material to the United States Government until the handing down of this judgment or further order.
But today the Queen’s Bench threw out the claim, branding it ‘not properly arguable’ and shutting down the route to frustrate the prosecution.
The judgement released today said: ‘We have concluded that this application is not properly arguable, and we refuse permission to apply for judicial review.
‘On the handing down of this judgment, the Order referred to, prohibiting the Secretary of State from providing any further material to the United States Government, has now ceased to have effect.’
Elsheikh and Kotey are accused of belonging to a cell of executioners in Syria – nicknamed The Beatles because of their British accents – responsible for killing a number of Western captives.
The new court move means they face a life sentence at the notorious ‘supermax’, formally known as the US Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility in Florence, Colorado.
El-Shafee El-Sheikh (left), 32, and Alexanda Kotey (right), 36, were members of the ‘Beatles’ terror cell which was behind the beheading of two British aid workers and two US journalists
Maha Elgizouli, whose son El Shafee Elsheikh, refused to comment on the legal proceedings
Maha Elgizouli with her son El Shafee Elsheikh, when he was a younger in childhood snap
At the hearing in London on September 11, Ms Elgizouli’s lawyers argued Ms Patel’s decision was unlawful as it is incompatible with the Data Protection Act, and are asking the court to order that no material should be provided to the US.
In written submissions to the court, Richard Hermer QC said the international transfer of the data is “not strictly necessary” in circumstances where the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is due to make a decision “imminently” about whether the pair should be prosecuted in the UK.
He argued Ms Patel did not make sufficient inquiries as to whether a prosecution would be undertaken in the UK, and she “failed to address adequately or at all” what the appropriate jurisdiction for a prosecution would be when reaching her decision.
The barrister added: “It is in any event irrational to decide to transfer data, and provide co-operation permitting the use of that data in US proceedings, in circumstances where there is a realistic prospect that the (DPP) may bring a prosecution… in this jurisdiction.”
Mr Hermer said the hearing is urgent as the US Government has indicated it will transfer the pair to Iraq for trial, where if found guilty they will be executed, if it does not receive all the evidence the UK has on them by October 15.
He said the DPP had indicated in late August that he would reach his decision on whether they should face trial in the UK in “three to four weeks”.
Lawyers for Maha Elgizouli claimed Home Secretary Priti Patel has not considered UK charges
Other members of the ‘Beatles’ cell are said to include Mohammed Emwazi, the group’s ringleader, also known as Jihadi John, who was killed in a US air strike in 2015, while Aine Davis is in jail in Turkey for terror offences, while Aine Davis is in jail in Turkey for terror offences
Ms Elgizouli’s case is opposed by the Home Secretary, and lawyers representing her say she acted “rationally and lawfully” when reaching her decision.
Sir James Eadie QC, representing Ms Patel, said the DPP has now concluded the review and determined that there is sufficient evidence to prosecute Elsheikh for a number of “terrorism-related offences”.
He told the court that those offences either require consent of the Attorney General, Suella Braverman, or her permission for the DPP to consent to a prosecution.
Mr Hermer said there was a charging decision by the DPP in 2016, made with the consent of the Attorney General, that there was sufficient evidence to charge Kotey – whose whereabouts were then unknown – with five offences of murder and eight of hostage taking.
He told the court the US authorities have “always made clear their preference” for both men to be tried in the UK, and said Ms Patel’s decision to share evidence was “premature” while there was still uncertainty about where they should face prosecution.
Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Garnham will give their ruling at 10.30am on Tuesday.
Elsheikh and Kotey were captured in January 2018, sparking an international row over whether they should be returned to the UK for trial or face justice in another jurisdiction.
They were transferred to the custody of the US military in Iraq in October 2019 and remain in American custody.
American officials revealed last month, in a letter to Ms Patel from US Attorney General William Barr, that they will not insist on the death penalty for the pair following any prosecution.
Ms Elgizouli previously brought a challenge to former home secretary Sajid Javid’s decision to share evidence with US authorities without seeking assurances the men would not be executed if convicted in the US.
Her case was dismissed by the High Court in January 2019 but that decision was overturned in March this year by a panel of seven Supreme Court justices, who unanimously allowed her appeal – ruling the decision to share evidence with the US was unlawful under the Data Protection Act.
In June 2018, Mr Javid authorised the sharing of 600 witness statements gathered by the Metropolitan Police under a “mutual legal assistance” agreement in a letter to then US attorney general Jeff Sessions.
Mr Javid faced intense criticism after the letter to Mr Sessions was leaked, with MPs accusing him of breaching the UK’s long-standing opposition to the death penalty.
Then prime minister Theresa May supported Mr Javid’s original decision, which was also backed by current Prime Minister Boris Johnson when he was foreign secretary.
Kotey and Elsheikh, who were raised in the UK but have been stripped of their British citizenship, were captured by the Syrian Democratic Forces in January 2018.
They are said to have been members of the cell that also included Mohammed Emwazi, known as Jihadi John, who was killed in a US air strike in 2015, and Aine Davis, who has been jailed in Turkey.
Emwazi appeared in a number of videos in which hostages, including British aid workers David Haines and Alan Henning and US journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, were killed.