Boris Johnson orders new lockdown easing for pubs and restaurants to save THREE MILLION jobs

1

View
comments

Boris Johnson will soon set out plans to ‘rebuild Britain’ in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, amid reports he wants to ease lockdown restrictions quickly to save millions of jobs.

The Prime Minister is expected to use a major speech to effectively relaunch the Conservatives’ domestic agenda after the Government’s attention turned to the Covid-19 crisis, during which the Tories’ poll rating has plummeted.

Mr Johnson will this week chair a meeting of his Cabinet to update them on the next lockdown-easing steps for a number of sectors, which are expected to take effect from June 15.

The Sunday Times reported that the PM will unveil plans to ease restrictions on weddings and funerals from next month, as well as possible measures to reopen hairdressers before July 4.

Planning controls will also be relaxed to enable pubs, cafés and restaurants to use outside areas.

And the paper said Mr Johnson has told Transport Secretary Grant Shapps to secure ‘travel corridor’ deals with holiday hotspots by June 28. 

Downing Street announced on Saturday night that churches and other places of worship are set to open for private prayer from June 15, but worship groups, weddings and other services will still not be permitted.

The PM is said to have signed off on plans to reopen the economy after being warned by Business Secretary Alok Sharma that a failure to reopen the hospitality sector could cost 3.5 million jobs. Mr Johnson reportedly replied: ‘Christ!’

 Another Cabinet source said that the Prime Minister wants the country to be ‘Back to normal or as near as possible to it by the summer.’

However, there are concerns that the reproduction rate of coronavirus is dangerously high – with a report by Public Health England and Cambridge University placing the R value just above 1 in the North West.

If R is 1 or higher, the virus will spread exponentially through the population, while a value less than 1 indicates the virus is in decline.

Senior figures from across the NHS have also issued a plea for a comprehensive plan to tackle a second wave of coronavirus infections. Health chiefs have also said that there should be no further easing of lockdown before the test and trace system has been proven to work.  

The Sunday Telegraph, meanwhile, reported that the Prime Minister would outline plans to accelerate major infrastructure projects – including pledges to build 40 new hospitals and key road upgrades – in a speech in the coming weeks.

Mr Johnson is also said to want to fast-track recruitment campaigns for doctors and nurses to increase the NHS’s resilience before the winter.

A Whitehall source told the paper that ‘getting the immediate crisis under control remains the Prime Minister’s main focus’, but said the Government is ‘also preparing for tough economic times ahead’.

‘The PM wants to explain that rebuilding after this crisis won’t be a repeat of 2008.

‘In the election the PM made the right diagnosis of the problems many people face. He believes now is the time to be even more ambitious with his plans to unite and level up the country.’

In other coronavirus developments today:

• An Opinium poll suggested just under half of the population disapprove of the Government’s handling of the crisis, while the Tory vote share has fallen to 43%, with Labour on 40%;
• Anti-racism protests following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis were held across the UK – despite a plea from the Health Secretary for people not to gather during lockdown;
• Healthcare chief Chris Hopson said NHS trusts were not consulted on plans for all hospital staff to wear surgical face masks and visitors and outpatients to wear face coverings from June 15;
• The Department of Health and Social Care said another 204 people had died after testing positive for coronavirus yesterday, taking the death toll to 40,465. The total toll for all deaths involving Covid-19 across the UK is thought to have passed 50,000. 

Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick announced that places of worship are expected to reopen for private, individual prayer from June 15.

He said: ‘People of all faiths have shown enormous patience and forbearance, unable to mark Easter, Passover, Ramadan or Vaisakhi with friends and family in the traditional way.

‘As we control the virus, we are now able to move forwards with a limited but important return to houses of worship.’ 

It comes as Tory MPs have expressed concern about ‘growing cracks’ between Boris Johnson and his Chancellor Rishi Sunak, as Cabinet splits widen over post-Brexit economic policy and the UK’s tense relationship with China.

Differences between the two most powerful members of the Government came to a head last week in meetings about the security threat posed by Beijing and the scope of a new trade deal with Washington.

Sources also claimed that a rift has opened up over coronavirus strategy – although allies of both men insisted last night they are ‘on the same page’ in terms of managing a swift exit from the lockdown and avoiding austerity measures during the recovery.

It comes as rumours swirl around Westminster that the Prime Minister is struggling to recover fully from being infected with Covid-19, and requires ‘power naps’ of two to three hours during the day – something Downing Street says is ‘completely untrue’.

The claims have fanned febrile talk on the backbenches – also denied – that Mr Sunak is already positioning himself for a run at the party leadership if it falls vacant in the next couple of years.

One of the sharpest differences between No 10 and No 11 is over China as Ministers have been alarmed by sabre-rattling from Beijing. 

The Chinese embassy in London is understood to have passed on warnings that the regime will take ‘economic revenge’ if the Government continues to warn it to respect democracy in Hong Kong – or goes ahead with a mooted U-turn on letting Huawei help to build the UK’s 5G mobile phone network.

At a meeting of the National Security Council on Tuesday, Mr Johnson unveiled plans for a new relationship with Beijing which would limit the UK’s economic dependence on the Communist state. 

However, it was met with stark warnings from Mr Sunak that ‘putting up an economic wall’ risked hampering Britain’s GDP and slowing the crisis recovery.

Mr Sunak was heavily backed by Business Secretary Alok Sharma and the pair made ‘a forthright case’ for continued Chinese investments in a range of sectors including nuclear power and steel.

But sources within the top-level meeting of senior politicians and spy chiefs argue that Mr Johnson sided with ‘more hawkish’ Ministers such as Home Secretary Priti Patel, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, who are pushing for a much tougher line on Chinese relations.

A source said: ‘The economic departments were obviously worried about their balance sheets and made that very clear. Rishi was reading from the Treasury’s script that we are all doomed if we don’t do as they say.’ 

But a defender of the Chancellor said he was clear that ‘we need to be more transactional with the Chinese’, but warned there would be an economic hit if we disregard the world’s second-largest economy.

Mr Sunak also disagrees with Mr Johnson over the terms of a new trade deal with America.

At a meeting on Monday of the XS Cabinet sub-committee, which thrashes out key Brexit policy issues, the Prime Minister rejected calls by Mr Sunak and International Trade Secretary Liz Truss for controversial US produce such as chlorinated chickens and hormone-filled beef to be allowed to enter the UK without being subject to high tariffs.

Mr Johnson, who chairs the meeting, sided with Environment Secretary George Eustice and Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove, who called for UK farmers to be protected from the new competition.

Mr Johnson has set himself against traditional Treasury orthodoxy by rejecting calls for tax rises and spending cuts to try to salvage the public finances following the huge financial hit of the pandemic.

One Conservative MP said: ‘The sense among my colleagues is that Rishi is allowing more cracks to grow between him and Boris. 

His approval ratings are better than the PM’s, which seems to have given him the confidence to push back in areas where they disagree.

‘The chatter about Boris needing naps of two to three hours a day has added to the sense that Rishi’s time could come sooner than expected.’

Last night a senior source confirmed that the austerity debate was ‘a very live discussion’ in No 10. The source said: ‘The issue is not so much with Rishi as with the senior Treasury mandarins, who are institutionally geared towards saving money.

‘But the PM’s position is that there is not going to be a repeat of 2008 by cutting public spending. His priority is to protect people and jobs.

‘This is a very live discussion in the building at the moment. While Rishi is alive to the human costs, the Treasury’s departmental mindset is geared towards austerity.’

Throughout the coronavirus crisis, Mr Sunak has been the leading ‘hawk’ calling for lockdown measures to be eased as quickly as safely possible.

While Mr Johnson was originally more cautious about lifting the restrictions – chastened from his instinctive liberalism by his brush with death – he is now understood to agree with Mr Sunak that the economy could suffer irreparable damage if the social-distancing rules are not relaxed more rapidly.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock, the leading lockdown ‘dove’, is ‘no longer in the driving seat in the issue’, sources say.

On China, an ally of Mr Johnson said: ‘The Prime Minister is trying to steer a moderate course between the China-bashers on the backbenches and those, such as the Chancellor, who worry about retreating into economic isolationism’. 

A Government source said: ‘No 10 and No 11 are as one in their joint determination to steer the country back to economic recovery in the safest possible way’.

Downing Street said it was ‘completely untrue’ that the Prime Minister needed sleeps during the day, or that Mr Sunak had leadership ambitions.

British Airways, Ryanair and easyJet SUE the government over ‘irrational and disproportionate’ 14-day quarantine rules

Ministers have been hit with an unprecedented joint legal action by UK airlines infuriated by plans to impose a two-week quarantine period on travellers entering Britain. 

British Airways, easyJet and Ryanair have joined forces to argue that the measure is illegal on the grounds that it is discriminatory, irrational and disproportionate. 

The carriers say that the move, which is due to be implemented tomorrow, was drawn up without consultation and will destroy their attempts to rebuild their businesses. 

A ‘pre-action’ letter, seen by The Mail on Sunday, highlights that while ‘weekly commuters’ such as French bankers travelling on the Eurostar will be exempt from the rule, British families going on their summer holidays will not. 

Lawyers working for IAG, the parent company for BA, say that the Statutory Instrument laid down by the Government last Thursday to introduce the rules is so ‘irrational and disproportionate’ as to be rendered unlawful. 

The letter points out that the 14-day quarantine period is more stringent than the guidelines applied to people who have tested positive for Covid-19, that the rules will not apply if you live in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland and that the controls will even relate to countries which have lower rates of infection than Britain. 

The airlines have told Government lawyers: ‘The Government has failed to identify a valid justification for the blanket nature of the regulations. 

‘The effect is to establish a wholly unjustified and disproportionate restriction on individuals travelling to England… and will inevitably mean that there is very little increase in the numbers of persons leaving and entering the country.’ 

Their letter adds: ‘The estimated proportion of the population infected with coronavirus is far higher than in other European countries… 

‘The disparity is so great that it reinforces the fact that it is illogical and irrational for the Government to be imposing self-isolation on persons entering the UK from Union countries.’ 

They add that the regulations ‘cannot possibly be justified, since individuals arriving in the UK in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales or living in those regions will not be bound by them’.

The move comes after Willie Walsh, the chief executive of IAG, wrote to MPs to explain the damage the policy would cause to his business and snubbed a meeting with Home Secretary Priti Patel, the architect of the plan. 

Mr Walsh said that the new rules – which some critics have called ‘crazy’ – had ‘torpedoed our opportunity to get flying in July’. 

BA had hoped to operate about 40 per cent of its scheduled flights next month but is now reworking its plans. It is burning through £20million a day and has racked up an additional £800million in short-term debt. 

The airline has also become embroiled in a dispute with unions over its plans to lay off up to 12,000 of its 43,000 staff. 

Bosses see this as vital as BA prepares to shrink to cope with lower demand for flights even after the pandemic subsides. 

In his letter to MPs, Mr Walsh said: ‘We find ourselves in the deepest crisis ever faced. A crisis not of our making but one which we must address. 

‘We will do everything in our power to ensure that British Airways can survive and sustain the maximum number of jobs consistent with the new reality of a changed airline industry in a severely weakened global economy.’ 

On Friday at 4pm, airline and airport bosses were sent a 23-page document setting out the new measures. 

The document, seen by the MoS, shows passengers will be asked to fill in a ‘Pre-Travel Passenger Locator’ form up to 48 hours before travelling. 

Anyone who refuses will be denied entry to the UK.

Closure of public loos to stop the spread of coronavirus could cause new health disaster: Anger as parks and beauty spots are defiled with waste

Closure of public loos to stop the spread of coronavirus could cause new health disaster: Anger as parks and beauty spots are defiled with waste 

Britain risks becoming ‘a third world country’ because of the decision to keep most public toilets closed during the coronavirus pandemic.

Experts last night warned of another looming ‘public health disaster’ because the reopening of conveniences has not kept pace with the easing of lockdown.

Families have spoken in horror at seeing day-trippers defiling beauty spots and parks and there are fears that shoppers will not return to the high street unless toilets are available.

Raymond Martin, managing director of the British Toilet Association (BTA), said a decade of austerity had already seen councils close facilities and a ‘revolution’ was required for WCs in the Covid-19 era.

‘We’ve had reports of people urinating in private gardens and defecating in between beach huts on the south coast,’ he said. ‘We’re not a third world country, for goodness sake. We were once the envy of the world for our standards of hygiene and provision.’

Facilities were closed when strict social distancing rules were introduced in March because of fears the virus would be spread by people touching handrails, gates, door handles and light switches.

Some councils and parks have reopened their toilets, but an appeal by the Government to open more has largely been ignored. Those include toilets operated by Royal Parks in eight London green spaces and the National Trust, which says it will only make them available when ‘it is safe to do so’.

Warm weather last weekend saw a rush to beauty spots, including Cornwall, Dorset and the Yorkshire Dales. Bristol councillor Paul Smith likened his city centre to a ‘huge urinal’ while Peak District cyclist Tom Clark said the area had been left devastated by people who ‘have forgotten how to behave’.

‘Litter, gates left open, regular whiff of marijuana, fires caused by barbecues, human and dog excrement,’ he said. ‘All public toilets are closed in order to deter visitors and while out on my bicycle I’ve seen a lot of public urination.’

Government scientific adviser Professor Robert Dingwall said if public toilets were cleaned ‘to the same standards as commercial ones’ there was ‘nothing much to worry about it’ and cautioned that human waste might pose a greater danger to health than Covid-19.

‘Toilets carry away infections, viruses and bacteria that may ordinarily be present in the lower part of our gut,’ he said. ‘If they get to the upper part, they are capable of causing serious stomach upsets and serious infections. If you have piles of human waste littering beauty spots, they do pose a health risk.’

Cuts to council budgets have led to the closure of at least one in seven public toilets and the BTA estimates 80 per cent of councils had cut spending on maintenance. In 2010, there were 5,159 toilets run by major councils in the UK but by 2018 that figure had fallen to 4,486, according to the Royal Society for Public Health.

In the Dorset market town of Bridport, businesswoman Caroline Parkins, 72, has stepped in to buy the town’s lavatory block after the council closed it. Mrs Parkins, who owns Leakers Bakery near the block, paid £108,000 – £80,000 over the asking price – after a bidding war with property developers.

She said: ‘We are a big tourist destination and the idea of not having any public toilets in the town is just ridiculous. You need them.’ After a renovation project, Mrs Parkins passed responsibility back to the council to maintain them, but they have been closed during lockdown.

High street stores are gearing up to reopen from June 15, but the continued closure of pubs and restaurants means there are already fewer conveniences.

Tesco has kept its toilets open and John Lewis said it will implement a ‘rigorous and frequent cleaning regime’ to keep conveniences in working order. Ikea is also doing more deep cleans while Bluewater shopping centre in Kent has kept its toilets open by removing a number of urinals and basins.

Dr Clara Greed, professor of inclusive urban planning at the University of the West of England, highlighted the ‘economic case’ for reopening conveniences. ‘As my American toilet colleagues say, “bathrooms means business”. If there are no loos, people will be less likely to go out, to go shopping, to be tourists,’ she said.

With fewer toilets there are also concerns some vulnerable groups and parents with young children will not be able to head out for any length of time. Tom Dillon, 33, who has Crohn’s disease, said the closure of the toilets in his local park made ‘planning any exercise or time outside impossible’.

The Government said that it ‘strongly encourages’ councils to open toilets where possible but the Local Government Association, which represents councils, said: ‘People should not assume toilets will be open and plan outdoor activities accordingly.’